EU, "those who censor silently will not be sued". “If you don't want your business raided, pay protection money”, that's what the mafia does...
“The European Commission has offered 𝕏 an illegal secret deal:
If we would censor silently, i.e. without telling anyone, they would not impose a penalty on us.
The other platforms accepted this deal.
𝕏 did not.”
Some thoughts - More food for mind as a very fundamental view to the world, world system we life in
Does the above have anything to do with law? Or are these methods more like those used by the mafia?
Is the EU confirming the independence of the EU court, or exactly the opposite? Because in the event of violations, the EU public prosecutor would or would have to act independently and autonomously anyway.
Every EU country has its own courts. Such a deal must therefore mean that the EU leaders are sure that they will not take action. What does this tell us about the national courts?
“Upright people are the people of the future, people who relentlessly bring secret agreements to the people.
We should ALL make sure that there are censorship-free platforms - even when Musk, TruthSocial, etc is gone.
If there are assassination attempts on presidents, presidential candidates, then it can hit any opponent of the global lobby.
PLEASE everyone get involved with NOSTR and create an account. If you are an IT professional, then it is important that there are as many NOSTR relays as possible.
For the people of the world to better understand the “EU”!
The “EU” is an association, which cannot pass laws.
The EU association makes “proposals”. The member states have committed themselves by membership to this association to enact national laws for these “proposals”.
The EU countries do this, or do not, or do so with considerable delay. Furthermore, the rules usually differ greatly from one another. And, above all, with widely differing controls.
The EU turns a blind eye here, and sends the European Court of Justice to other, uncomfortable countries. In addition, EU funds are withheld if a country does not comply. Most recently, Poland and Hungary were hit with tens of billions. Poland has now received everything. Hungary got 10 billion because Orban went for a coffee to cast a vote in the EU Council. Because with his vote, the unanimous vote would have failed.
BUT, if the EU Council MUST vote unanimously, then everyone must be present AND vote. So even the faked coffee break absence is necessarily invalid.
Every child knows that in associations, if the board members are not present in the minimum number, then meetings are not quorate.