New England Journal of Medicine: There are generally insufficient safety studies on vaccinations
Dr. Sabine Stebel has published a very informative article on the safety and ingredients of vaccines - in response to a publication in the renowned New England Journal of Medicine, in which it is openly admitted for the first time that there are generally insufficient safety studies on vaccinations.
I'll try to summarize the whole thing as simply as possible. The results vary depending on the vaccine. I leave out the classification because it gets too confusing. This means that the following does NOT apply equally to every vaccine.
First of all: Classic “vaccines” are “ incubated” with fetal cell lines
Vaccine analyses were published in Italy in 2019 and found:
Complex and largely unknown molecules
Undisclosed protein impurities (note: proteins are also enzymes, biocatalysts that control chemical reactions in the body. Can be little fun)
The specified effective antigens could not be found
This may also be due to the analysis method
It could also be due to the inhibition of digestion by vaccine additives (adjuvants). This could be confirmed by the fact that residues of biological digestion were found. This concerns digestion by the body's own digestive enzyme trypsin
All vaccinations contained aluminum and/or formaldehyde (adjuvant)
Fetal DNA in large quantities > 325 times higher than the limit for carcinogenic DNA according to drug agency regulations
Typically originates from the production process
The DNA is equivalent in weight to a whole DNA and comes from a male human.
Formaldehyde and genetic material
Risk of autoimmunity, local and systemic inflammation and genetic mutations
DNA and RNA impurities from bacteria, human DNA, mouse DNA, phages, molluscum contagiosum virus, mouse leukemia virus, human endogenous retrovirus K., infectious equine anemia virus and mouse leukemia virus, among others.
Psychoactive drug APDB from the phenethylamine and amphetamine classes
Chemical impurities
Chemical poisons
Bacterial toxins
Unknown large molecules indigestible by the body
Summary so far
Many impurities come from the manufacturing process and vary depending on the batch. I don't think the production process is sufficiently under control.
In 1960, experiments were carried out on ducks where pure DNA was simply injected. At that time, physical changes in the animals could already be detected. Likewise the change in the following generation. The study described the ducks as modified ducks.
Known effects overall
Injection of large quantities of foreign DNA has an effect on the treated animals and their offspring
It is known that organ transplants can change people's personalities
In women, it is known that the fetal cells can continue to change their bodies for a long time.
“Most of the products do NOT meet the approved specifications and are contaminated. Far beyond the limits. This is the normal state of affairs, which not only affects COVID products, the rest have always been contaminated, but nobody cared.
Side step to the Pope of vaccinations and his own revelations under sworn hearing
Plotkin, 2024, 92 years young, still plays a decisive role:
2003: Professor Emeritus at the Wistar Institute
2006: Professor Emeritus of Virology, University of Pennsylvania
2006: Executive Advisor, Sanofi Pasteur
2014: Senior Advisor, Global Virus Network
Associate Chair, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania
Member, Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology
Adjunct Lecturer, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Scientific advisor, Mymetik
2017: Scientific advisor (and co-founder) of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)
2018 Scientific advisor to the company CureVac
Attorney Aaron Siri, who sued out the Pfizer documents, writes:
“Dr. Stanley Plotkin (Stanley Plotkin - Wikipedia), the world's leading vaccinologist, and his followers have just capitulated. After decades of claiming that the safety of vaccines has been thoroughly studied, they have just admitted that this was not the case either before or after licensure.
It is amazing that Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his followers, the vaccinologists, who for decades insisted that vaccines were the best researched products on the planet, have now just written an article admitting the exact opposite. They simply admitted that vaccines are not sufficiently studied - neither before nor after approval. For example, they admitted that
“pre-authorization clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that ”no funding is provided for post-authorization safety studies.”
This is an incredible U-turn. But let me explain the context so that no one is misled about what they are obviously up to: For decades, the medical community insisted that vaccines were the most thoroughly researched products ever..
….
There are no studies by pharmaceutical companies that have examined vaccinated, unvaccinated or placebo-vaccinated people in the long term
Autoimmune diseases can be triggered (allergies, etc.) and the possible genetic, physical and mental changes in people are even more dramatic.
All of this must take everyone's breath away, because big, big questions arise: What drives scientists to maintain their claims? Are the statements deliberately knowing, negligent or is it also so sad that it is all about the cheap ego of researchers. So cheap that even the health of millions of people doesn't matter.
Who wants to listen to Plotkin...
Playlist from 2020 with just a few thousand views
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUv9oht3hC6TqM6ubm4UfosW0U_pZq0ak
Why are Föstus cells from a Swedish and English woman from the 1960s still being used today?
Questioning of Plotkin under oath just to get a first taste
Aborted babies for the production of vaccines? “Dr. Plotkin King of Vaccines”
Total questioning under oath over 9 hours
I think you have to have seen this once in your life. The time stamps shorten it considerably.
Backup: https://archive.org/details/2015-831539-DM
Written record of the interview: https://www.lumenfidei.ie/documents/dr-stanley-plotkin-testimony.pdf
Selected extracts from the testimony:
1:21:00 I don't do it for the money
1:24:00 Would you remember if you were paid 6 million dollars?
2:44:00 Rotavirus conflict of interest
2:50:30 Working Group ACIP discussions
2:53:00 There's a gavel with my name on it
3:17:00 Is 5 days long enough?
3:32:00 There was no placebo group?
3:45:20 The package insert for MMR2
3:59:20 "Serious Adverse Events"
4:24:20 The GARDASIL/saline Placebo Contol
4:48:00 "Double-blind works if you want to be certain, but..."
5:33:00 Do vaccines cause autism?
5:43:00 Shouldn't you wait?
6:05:00 We've been asking for 30 years
6:09:00 The only placebo vs. vaccine study results
6:58:00 A letter to HHS
7:05:30 What kind of antigens are in vaccines?
7:11:33 Calf serum, guinea pig cells, and cow's milk
7:39:20 Does Aluminum bind to cells?
7:43:10 How many fetuses' have you worked with?
7:50:40 Did you used orphans to test an experimental disease 13 years AFTER the Nuremberg Code?
7:54:02 The letter to the editor of Ethics of Human Experimentation - "It's unlike Nazi philosophy"
7:56:00 The 1959 experiments on over 1 million locals under Colonial Rule in the Congo has no samples left
8:02:50 Do you take issues with Religious beliefs?
8:12:00 Since you're so interested in my income...
8:18:30 Are you asking me if I'm launching AIDS?!
8:27:00 Pertussis transmission and the Warfel studies
8:31:00 How do you define an Anti-Vaxer?
8:47:30 Harvard's Study of VAERS Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System finds less than 1% are reported